Legislature(1993 - 1994)
03/16/1994 01:40 PM Senate HES
Audio | Topic |
---|
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
CHAIRMAN RIEGER introduced HB 2 (DRUG TESTING FOR SCHOOL BUS DRIVERS) as the next order of business before the committee. SENATOR SALO asked if HB 2 applies to temporary drivers and how does HB 2 apply to volunteer drivers. MIKE HEIMBUCH, staff to Representative Gail Phillips, stated that the intent of HB 2 was to speak to those employed by the school district. The language seemed to be flexible enough to allow the Department of Education (DOE) to adopt the scope of the bill through regulations. SENATOR SALO noted that contracted drivers also fall within the scope of the bill. She informed the committee that currently, some districts are drug testing upon initial employment, randomly testing, or testing for cause. She expressed her belief that testing for cause was of primary importance. HB 2 would mandate drug testing. She asked who would pay for the testing. MIKE HEIMBUCH stated that at present there is an $84,000 fiscal note for DOE. SENATOR DUNCAN believed that the fiscal note does not specify who would pay for the testing. He assumed that the $79,000 contractual portion of the fiscal note would pay for the testing. He inquired of the possibility that individual drivers would be required to pay for the drug test if the fiscal note was zeroed out. MIKE HEIMBUCH could not answer. SENATOR DUNCAN did not believe that school bus drivers should have to pay for the testing. MIKE HEIMBUCH said that he read HB 2 as saying that the school districts or areas that provide for transportation would provide for the random drug testing. SENATOR DUNCAN noted that the language was "shall require." MIKE HEIMBUCH stated that HB 2 requires that the driver would submit to the testing, but not requiring that the driver pay for the testing. SENATOR DUNCAN explained that without funding for the state to pay for the testing, then the bill would not prohibit a school district requiring the drivers to submit and pay for the testing. He expressed the need to make the language explicit. MIKE HEIMBUCH pointed out that the language referring to developing regulations was thought to speak to the possibility that DOE and different districts could not adequately administer the testing, this language would allow them to address it quicker than through the statutes. SENATOR DUNCAN requested a DOE representative. SENATOR SALO inquired of the percentage of Alaska school bus drivers currently under a drug testing program. Number 345 ROMAYNE KAREEN, Program Coordinator for People Transportation in the School Bus Safety section, the Department of Education, did not know the percentage of the large districts with the contracted operations. She noted some internal requirements of drug testing in the contracted operations. On the peninsula, random testing is prohibited by the union contract with the drivers, the company and the school district. SENATOR SALO suggested that perhaps 80 or 90 percent of the drivers are under drug testing. ROMAYNE KAREEN thought the percentage was probably not that high. SENATOR DUNCAN asked who would be charged under HB 2. ROMAYNE KAREEN explained that the fiscal note was present with the understanding that DOE would coordinate and oversee the program on a statewide basis. If the fiscal note was zeroed out, Ms. Kareen assumed that DOE would have to address that situation. SENATOR DUNCAN expressed concern that the bus drivers may be required to pay for the drug testing. He suggested that the language be made more explicit. ROMAYNE KAREEN stated that regarding the contractual amount, the fiscal note would include the cost of the testing. She pointed out various ways to handle this issue: a written contract between the school district and the school bus contractor, and an agreement between the department and school districts who run their own transportation system. SENATOR DUNCAN did not understand why the language could not be more explicit and say that the school bus driver would not be charged for the drug testing. ROMAYNE KAREEN explained that school bus drivers have a high turnover rate and there are incentives for the employer to pick up some costs. For instance, the commercial drivers license and the mandatory training program are some of the up front costs a bus driver may face. SENATOR SALO stated that there are reasons that contacts between companies and bus drivers have opposed random testing. Many believe that random drug testing is demeaning not to mention the possibilities of a false positive. She felt that drug testing for cause is appropriate. She explained that in this time of fiscal constraints with educational funding, money could be better spent elsewhere. She indicated that HB 2 could open up to drug testing in other areas, such as food service workers. She believed that the drug testing of HB 2 does not in general protect the individual. Perhaps, it would act as a deterrent to some extent. She said that the fiscal note must only be coordination of the program, how could that include the testing. ROMAYNE KAREEN informed the committee that the $84,000 fiscal note included the testing. She detailed the fiscal note for the committee: $5,000 for a hearing officer, $3,000 for travel, $2,000 for supplies, $2,000 for printing and postage, and the remaining $72,000 for testing. She stated that there should have been an attachment to the fiscal note explaining the details. Number 427 SENATOR DUNCAN asked if HB 2 would override those contracts such as the Kenai Peninsula that prohibit random drug testing. ROMAYNE KAREEN said that HB 2 would override those contracts that currently prohibit random drug testing. She indicated that the school bus industry believes random drug testing would be a deterrent. SENATOR SALO asked if the school bus industry believes there is a problem. ROMAYNE KAREEN said yes, the industry does feel there is a problem in some areas that they are notable to address currently. SENATOR SALO inquired of the industries' ability to test for cause. ROMAYNE KAREEN stated that it would depend upon the internal structure between the school and the bus contractor within the company. SENATOR SHARP moved HB 2 out of committee with individual recommendations and the accompanying fiscal note. Senator Salo objected. A hand vote was taken and the bill moved.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|